Most active commenters

    Surfing on a Matchbox (1999)

    (news.bbc.co.uk)
    31 points TMWNN | 14 comments | 07 Jul 25 03:05 UTC | HN request time: 1.446s | source | bottom
    1. revx ◴[09 Jul 25 04:01 UTC] No.44506240[source]▶
    Anyone know the current record-holder for world's smallest web server? :)
    replies(2): >>44506550 #>>44508577 #
    2. em3rgent0rdr ◴[09 Jul 25 05:15 UTC] No.44506532[source]▶
    Ahh, back in the hopeful days of the early net when we imagined people of the future would be in possession of and run their own webservers...
    3. femto ◴[09 Jul 25 05:19 UTC] No.44506550[source]▶
    Probably just a matter of loading the necessary software onto this MCU:

    https://www.ti.com/about-ti/newsroom/news-releases/2025/2025...

    replies(2): >>44506859 #>>44507004 #
    4. kingstnap ◴[09 Jul 25 06:24 UTC] No.44506859{3}[source]▶
    According to the specs, it has 1kB of ram. You're going to need to be quite clever to implement a working TCP-IP stack and an HTTP server in that.

    An RSA key is 4kB by itself, so TLS is out of the picture.

    5. teekert ◴[09 Jul 25 06:41 UTC] No.44506961[source]▶
    It’s sad isn’t (wasn’t) such a professor as a waste of money? I mean the market dictates what we get, with some influential persons and companies, but it’s all chance.

    Why do we have these well paid professors working on stuff like this?

    I think if we feel that we do need them, they should be laser focused on making sure there are societal benefits to tech. Not “working on cool stuff”.

    Or is this no longer happening?

    replies(2): >>44507140 #>>44507544 #
    6. em3rgent0rdr ◴[09 Jul 25 06:50 UTC] No.44507004{3}[source]▶
    I was also going to suggest that... But I imagine that the Ethernet port or antennae wire (and necessary battery to power antennae) would dwarf the size of that MCU. But thinking again, I suppose if the rules permit the MCU to be directly wired to the Ethernet cable, then could bitbang an early Ethernet standard with this MCU's pins...
    replies(2): >>44507591 #>>44508516 #
    7. Seylox ◴[09 Jul 25 08:28 UTC] No.44507544[source]▶
    You must be fun at parties. /s
    replies(1): >>44509417 #
    8. st_goliath ◴[09 Jul 25 08:33 UTC] No.44507591{4}[source]▶
    If you're going to use an Ethernet jack anyway, you might as well use one that has an ARM SoC already built in and runs Linux:

    https://www.digikey.at/en/product-highlight/d/digi-intl/digi...

    replies(1): >>44507966 #
    9. jagged-chisel ◴[09 Jul 25 09:41 UTC] No.44507966{5}[source]▶
    “Obsolete and no longer manufactured.” :-(
    10. NoboruWataya ◴[09 Jul 25 10:14 UTC] No.44508159[source]▶
    Interesting how he was kind of, but not quite, on the right track in terms of predicting where technology would go. Small "wearable" (in the sense that you carry them on your person) computers obviously became huge, but not in the way that he was thinking. I was a kid back then, so wasn't thinking too deeply about the future of technology, but mobile phones were already a thing and some were becoming internet-compatible, so in hindsight smartphones seem a more obvious next step than "a special glove that can recognize a digital sign language". Maybe not at the time though.
    11. femto ◴[09 Jul 25 11:05 UTC] No.44508516{4}[source]▶
    I'd do a serial connection using the UART. Serial is a perfectly valid transport.
    12. aa-jv ◴[09 Jul 25 11:13 UTC] No.44508577[source]▶
    I have a web server (not public) that runs on my M5Stack device ..

    https://m5stack.com

    And my magicShifter also serves web pages to anyone in my environment ..

    https://magicshifter.net/

    But I guess the standard is 'on the public web', akin to most publicly accessible web surfers .. for that, I'd be a bit uncomfortable exposing my m5stack/magicshifter to the web, for the time being ..

    13. teekert ◴[09 Jul 25 12:48 UTC] No.44509417{3}[source]▶
    It’s your/our (tax) money. The money of the people.