←back to thread

349 points tareqak | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.09s | source | bottom
Show context
agwa ◴[] No.44469695[source]
As a small software business owner, I have to agree with Michele Hansen (who spent 2 years advocating on behalf of small software businesses for this very change): "we’re finally going to get Section 174 relief, and I couldn’t be angrier" https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mjwhansen_it-looks-like-were-...
replies(5): >>44469716 #>>44469955 #>>44470055 #>>44470303 #>>44470890 #
1. WatchDog ◴[] No.44470120[source]
Unless there is some kind of relationship to tech, political posts are generally removed from this site.

You shouldn’t interpret this sites focus as the people that post here not thinking there are more important things.

replies(2): >>44470152 #>>44470254 #
2. LexiMax ◴[] No.44470152[source]
I'm familiar with the voting patterns of HN users.

For this reason I tend to browse HN using the https://news.ycombinator.com/active frontpage because it contains the flagged topics that certain users of this site attempt to hide, while also preserving the vast majority of interesting tech-related topics.

replies(1): >>44470908 #
3. Teever ◴[] No.44470254[source]
There's no guarantee that posts related to tech that are also related to political stuff will avoid being flagged.

Even when there is a relationship with tech political posts are generally removed if they don't align with a zeitgeist of modern America that seems to chose to fall in line instead of resisting unseemly actions by the new government.

replies(1): >>44470921 #
4. Thorrez ◴[] No.44470908{3}[source]
It's not about voting patterns. It's about the rules of HN:

>On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.

>Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>44472825 #
5. Thorrez ◴[] No.44470921{3}[source]
The vast majority of stuff on HN I've seen about Trump and DOGE has been negative.

You seem to be saying HN will promote pro-Trump stuff and delete anti-Trump stuff. That's simply false. I can give a ton of highly upvoted anti-Trump posts.

6. LexiMax ◴[] No.44472825{4}[source]
I am also aware of what the rules say, as well as how they tend to be applied in practice.

The latter is why I don't find arguments that fall back on the former persuasive.