(twitter.com)

932 points sohzm | 2 comments | 04 Jul 25 02:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.414s | source

1. Semaphor ◴[04 Jul 25 02:43 UTC] No.44460726[source]▶

But they didn’t. The company violated the GPL by re-publishing it illegally as Apache.

2. geoffpado ◴[04 Jul 25 02:43 UTC] No.44460729[source]▶

But… he didn’t? He used the GPLv3 license, which has other requirements. Requirements that aren’t being met by the people who forked the codebase.

My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]