←back to thread

Conversations with a hit man

(magazine.atavist.com)
146 points gmays | 7 comments | | HN request time: 1.444s | source | bottom
1. tomhow ◴[] No.44451848[source]
> I quit before I got to anything interesting

This is the kind of shallow dismissal we don't want on HN.

replies(1): >>44452563 #
2. therein ◴[] No.44452563[source]
I think it exceeds that bar. If he had said "TLDR" and ended it there, sure but he approached it with humor and with a few quips I found relatively eloquent. I personally don't think there is anything wrong with that.

He is humorously criticizing the author's artistic choices. I think he did it pleasantly enough, how else do we want this to be done on HN?

replies(3): >>44452686 #>>44452930 #>>44460229 #
3. n4r9 ◴[] No.44452686{3}[source]
In my opinion it's a shallow and tangential post. If you're going to comment on aesthetics over substance, at least caveat your comments with that and do it thoughtfully.
replies(1): >>44455715 #
4. jajko ◴[] No.44452930{3}[source]
Is bored teenager approach "humorous" and "pleasant enough"? Not really, au contraire
5. stronglikedan ◴[] No.44455715{4}[source]
And here I am clicking dead comment links to read tangential posts. How about leave it like it is, where tangential posts can be hidded/flagged/killed but still available to those who want to read them. No one likes a gatekeeper.
replies(1): >>44455945 #
6. n4r9 ◴[] No.44455945{5}[source]
I'm fine with leaving it like it is and didn't mean to suggest otherwise. Just saying that a tangential post has a better chance of staying alive if it's thoughtful.
7. pvg ◴[] No.44460229{3}[source]
criticizing the author's artistic choices.

There's no mention of 'artistic choices', it's just self-congratulation on one's personal choice to not-read. A perfectly valid choice but it's HN-offtopic since it's hard to square 'curious conversation' with 'trumpeting one's incuriosity'.