←back to thread

205 points n1b0m | 8 comments | | HN request time: 1.055s | source | bottom
1. userbinator ◴[] No.43325210[source]
doing some random house chores

"Domestic servant" is a profession.

replies(1): >>43325282 #
2. themaninthedark ◴[] No.43325221[source]
Because Tourists aren't issued the requisite tax filing information.

Because a large corporation could put a factory on the boarder, bus in "Tourists" to do work.

Because we put up barriers to protect labor.

Pick one or all and order how you like.

3. toast0 ◴[] No.43325260[source]
Instagram clowning, I dunno, but random house chores sounds hard for immigration to distinguish from a live-in maid/domestic service. Exchanging chores for room and board is an exchange of work for value, so yeah, that's a job; unless there's an exception.

The article is a little bit unclear, but it sounds like she wanted to cross into Canada and do the same thing, but Canada instructed her to return to the US and reapply in the proper category, and then the US presumably asked more questions and determined that her stay in the US was likely on the wrong visa too.

But I don't understand why the US wouldn't send her home to the UK? How many days of detention does it take to equal a flight home? Also seems weird that Canada wouldn't let her in, or offer to send her home, given Canada and UK have the same King.

4. cguess ◴[] No.43325282[source]
And often a highly exploitative one, especially for immigrants.
5. darth_avocado ◴[] No.43325289[source]
You don’t want people to come in for 6 months, work below minimum wage and then take all that cash abroad without paying taxes. That would be a bigger drain on the economy than the supposed waste of govt resources.
replies(2): >>43325488 #>>43327225 #
6. TimorousBestie ◴[] No.43325488[source]
Mmm, she’s getting the whole border patrol indefinite incarceration oubliette treatment, it’s not going to take long to rack up more cost than your hypothetical taxes on 6mo @ <=7.25/hr.

But sure, if the ‘tourists’ are working for a company en masse, I can see how that could be a problem. The feds will probably do better going after the company, in my estimation. For some reason they don’t seem to do that very often.

Self-employment or bartering (as happened here), well, that doesn’t make sense to me to prosecute.

replies(1): >>43325668 #
7. darth_avocado ◴[] No.43325668{3}[source]
You’re looking at one case and arguing “one person couldn’t hurt much”. But that argument could be made for a million cases individually. But together, that will amount to a lot. And it’s not just taxes, those are wages another citizen could be making. We have work visas, which already face a lot of opposition. Why should we then be okay with tourists working and taking up American jobs?
8. anigbrowl ◴[] No.43327225[source]
>6 months

>work below minimum wage

>all that cash

~$6000?