Most active commenters
  • yannigk(6)

78 points yannigk | 28 comments | | HN request time: 1.068s | source | bottom

Hi, we're MathGPT! MathGPT creates Khan-Academy-style animated math videos that intuitively explain complex concepts to students, helping them understand how to solve their problems step-by-step. We're currently serving over 2M users, processing 800M tokens / day and growing! If you try it out, we would appreciate feedback on how we can make the overall experience / video generation better! Email me at ygk2[at]cornell.edu.
1. freakynit ◴[] No.42186181[source]
Holy cow this is insanely wonderful. Extremely beautiful explanation of concepts. The generated videos are like professionally hard-crafted. Great work!
replies(1): >>42190684 #
2. jrussino ◴[] No.42186563[source]
FYI for the input "Graph a cartoid and explain it" I get a correct definition and some interesting facts/properties (in spite of the fact that I mis-remembered the name of the object I had in mind; it should have been "cardioid"). But then it tries to provide a plot, and the plot has an error:

``` Error Please check your input: Undefined variable heta ```

Looks like there's a "theta" that's being incorrectly truncated, or something to that effect.

I refreshed a few times and found that I consistently saw this same error.

replies(1): >>42192091 #
3. IndieCoder ◴[] No.42186966[source]
Kudos for the UI, very nice to see the seamless integration of formulas, graphs and videos!
replies(1): >>42192100 #
4. zaptrem ◴[] No.42186969[source]
We used it to make memes (single sentence prompts) and the results are hilarious

How Jeb! Won the election: https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=b9e16dbd-cab6-44e3-a393-f255b...

Mathematical proof AI is doomed: https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=c5745f99-b1d1-4c57-8a93-6fe3b...

replies(4): >>42187864 #>>42189024 #>>42190027 #>>42191869 #
5. bassrattle ◴[] No.42187517[source]
As a test, I input a2b2. It interpretted that as a^2xb^2 which is fine but it kept pronouncing "A squared" as "a square" (more phonetically, "uh square")

For a tool meant to enlighten, hearing "a square be square" was confusing.

6. jamilton ◴[] No.42187864[source]
Surprisingly funny! AI is often unfunny when it tries to be funny, I wonder why this is better.
replies(1): >>42187878 #
7. zaptrem ◴[] No.42187878{3}[source]
We wondered the same thing! I wonder which model they’re using.
8. murkle ◴[] No.42188910[source]
Sorry, this one is really terrible (also I asked for no audio) https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=6f622c5b-ccf3-408f-9db1-56d63...
replies(1): >>42191735 #
9. malshe ◴[] No.42189024[source]
Hilarious! This can potentially go viral
10. pixelsort ◴[] No.42190027[source]
Ha! Okay, I laughed at "computational phrenology".
11. j_bum ◴[] No.42190684[source]
Any examples? I’ve tried several prompts and get errors each time the plotting begins
replies(1): >>42194386 #
12. vivzkestrel ◴[] No.42191201[source]
it says .org in the domain. Is this a "for-profit" privately operated company or some experiment with GPT? did you guys build your own proprietary model or is it using some open source LLM model?
13. 8n4vidtmkvmk ◴[] No.42191632[source]
Neat, but I think I'd like it better if you simplified it and dropped the focus on teaching students. What I'd prefer is a slightly smarter WolframAlpha that doesn't force me to learn their weird syntax. Let me ask my math question in English, you turn that into a formula and just give me the solution. I don't need the explanation.

The video generation is overly ambitious. Some of them come out wonky and wrong.

14. yannigk ◴[] No.42191735[source]
Thank you for the feedback! Working on it!
15. yannigk ◴[] No.42191869[source]
Haha these are amazing! I love them!
16. pino999 ◴[] No.42191967[source]
I don't know, it is still chatgpt. I wouldn't let it near homework soon. I do enjoy the latex rendering.

Anyway it can't even solve x mod 66 = 3 (answer: x = 3 + 66k, where k = 0, 1, ...)

Somehow it thinks the answer is 32 and it comes with a huge blob of shit.

replies(1): >>42192083 #
17. yannigk ◴[] No.42192083[source]
Thanks for the feedback. We can improve the model's focus on the task at hand and/or ask for more details if doesn't have enough context. With a bit more clarification, MathGPT outputs your answer: https://math-gpt.org/?problem_text=solve%20x%20mod%2066%20%3....
18. yannigk ◴[] No.42192091[source]
I was able to replicate your error and pushed a fix, it should be working pretty reliably now for equations that include theta. Let me know if it works for you!
19. yannigk ◴[] No.42192100[source]
Thank you!
20. fph ◴[] No.42192492[source]
Very neat! Can created content be reused freely by teachers? Do you require attribution? I am interested in tikz plots more than in videos, personally.
21. lagrange77 ◴[] No.42192522[source]
That's a really interesting application of LLMs and manim.

My problem with it, as with LLMs in general, is that i can't fully trust it. This isn't a problem with topics you know well. But those 3b1b style tutorials are meant to build an understanding or mental model of a concept for people who don't know it well yet. I'm afraid that, if the output is (partially) wrong, watching such a video could be even harmful in understanding the concept, because your 'greenfield' brain may pick up pieces of it that made sense to it.

22. freakynit ◴[] No.42194386{3}[source]
I tried following:

1. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors

2. Principal component analysis

3. Low rank matrices

23. Alifatisk ◴[] No.42196450[source]
I am so happy tools like these gets created and is available for free.

When growing up, I had difficulty learning math and I wasn't able to ask my parents for help so much. That is when I found PhotoMath, it changed my life, it became my second teacher and it was for free! I don't think Google even owned it at the time.

I remember being very scared of losing it one day. Luckily that never happened, but I will never forget how much these math tools helped me growing up.

24. mlukaszek ◴[] No.42198601[source]
It's pretty good! It did quite well when asked a variant of "when do the trains meet" problem, although it used different values for speed than what I told it to use (and what it actually used in textual response: 120km/h and 20km/h in video vs 80km/h and 60km/h in the prompt and textual response).

https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=a7489ec5-b06e-480a-96c4-27765...

If it did the animations in 3Blue1Brown style, that would be cherry on the top! ;-)

Edit: I did notice it uses Manim, it just doesn't have the same feeling

replies(1): >>42198737 #
25. xenonite ◴[] No.42198737[source]
Sadly the resulting calculation is wrong (190/140≠1.5)
replies(1): >>42202359 #
26. sprobertson ◴[] No.42201646[source]
Very cool, how does it work? (even if just at a high level)
27. mlukaszek ◴[] No.42202359{3}[source]
Haha I did not even register that as I expected 1.5 as the answer...