Most active commenters

    45 points robaato | 11 comments | | HN request time: 1.772s | source | bottom
    1. Animats ◴[] No.42071463[source]
    "or paying for the required license?"

    Where was the acceptance of a contract requiring that? Microsoft just gave people a free upgrade.

    replies(1): >>42072582 #
    2. ahoka ◴[] No.42071554[source]
    “installs itself” = a 3rd party patch management product installed the update
    replies(2): >>42071963 #>>42072024 #
    3. gnabgib ◴[] No.42071594[source]
    Discussion (75 points, 18 hours ago, 26 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42057451
    4. troseph ◴[] No.42071721[source]
    David Attenborough voiced "Sysadmins are cautious by nature" in my head.
    5. heraldgeezer ◴[] No.42071963[source]
    Or if you auto approve security updates. As is common. Azure VMs even default to auto-update pulls from MS.

    https://imgur.com/a/RvEx3yn

    6. Brian_K_White ◴[] No.42072024[source]
    A 3rd party tool did what MS told it to do.
    7. PittleyDunkin ◴[] No.42072582[source]
    I imagine the definition of "upgrade" depends on the needs of the customer. The merchant of the license is inherently unable to evaluate this. Installing software without explicit consent, especially not-functionally-equivalent-software, is inherently wrong.
    replies(1): >>42072809 #
    8. mattsimpson ◴[] No.42072721[source]
    We got an urgent notice today from our central IT group warning of this catastrophic screw up of epic proportions, and I could hardly believe it.

    This is way worse than the Crowdstrike debacle.

    9. causality0 ◴[] No.42072809{3}[source]
    It's amazing to me that we're all so chill about a company in Redmond having root access to our PCs because they pinky-swear they will never misuse it.
    replies(1): >>42072826 #
    10. ranger_danger ◴[] No.42072826{4}[source]
    And yet when you call it what it is (a backdoor) people get highly offended. Same thing with ubuntu snaps or really anything that updates automatically.