Most active commenters
  • protomolecule(9)
  • gambiting(5)
  • rendall(4)
  • pavel_lishin(3)

←back to thread

197 points amichail | 27 comments | | HN request time: 2.034s | source | bottom
Show context
consumer451 ◴[] No.41865107[source]
The most complete plan for this was proposed by JPL's Slava Turyshev and team. It has been selected for Phase III of NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts. [0]

> In 2020, Turyshev presented his idea of Direct Multi-pixel Imaging and Spectroscopy of an Exoplanet with a Solar Gravitational Lens Mission. The lens could reconstruct the exoplanet image with ~25 km-scale surface resolution in 6 months of integration time, enough to see surface features and signs of habitability. His proposal was selected for the Phase III of the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts. Turyshev proposes to use realistic-sized solar sails (~16 vanes of 10^3 m^2) to achieve the needed high velocity at perihelion (~150 km/sec), reaching 547 AU in 17 years.

> In 2023, a team of scientists led by Turychev proposed the Sundiver concept,[1] whereby a solar sail craft can serve as a modular platform for various instruments and missions, including rendezvous with other Sundivers for resupply, in a variety of different self-sustaining orbits reaching velocities of ~5-10 AU/yr.

Here is an interview with him laying out the entire plan.[2] It is the most interesting interview that I have seen in years, possibly ever.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slava_Turyshev#Work

[1] https://www2.mpia-hd.mpg.de/~calj/sundiver.pdf

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqzJewjZUkk

replies(6): >>41865368 #>>41866873 #>>41867659 #>>41870451 #>>41871463 #>>41874418 #
1. rendall ◴[] No.41867724[source]
Stop. For whatever reason, he has people call him Slava and does not correct them when they do so.
replies(1): >>41867875 #
2. ithkuil ◴[] No.41867734[source]
The Wikipedia article uses the name "Slava". His homepage on JPL website too (https://science.jpl.nasa.gov/people/turyshev/) I opened a random paper of his from arxiv and there too he uses "Slava".

Would it be possible that Mr. Turyshev uses that name as his preferred name (at least when writing in English) and that we should just respect his decision?

replies(1): >>41867865 #
3. protomolecule ◴[] No.41867865[source]
This decision is forced by it being hard for most English speakers to pronounce Vyacheslav.
replies(1): >>41868028 #
4. protomolecule ◴[] No.41867875[source]
>For whatever reason

The reason is that you won't bother to pronounce Vyacheslav so Russians have to use a short version of their name.

replies(2): >>41868035 #>>41869265 #
5. gambiting ◴[] No.41868028{3}[source]
Sure, but is it his decision to make, and if yes - are we ok to respect it?

I'm from a slavic country myself and my name is almost impossible to pronounce correctly in English - but I continue to use it anyway. If he wanted to do that, he could have done it.

replies(1): >>41870176 #
6. gambiting ◴[] No.41868035{3}[source]
No, they don't have to - they are chosing to. To pretend otherwise is to say they don't have agency in this, which they do.
replies(1): >>41868222 #
7. protomolecule ◴[] No.41868222{4}[source]
Even if somebody puts a gun to your head and orders you to change your name, you'd still have a choice and it would be your decision what to do. That's not much of an argument though.
replies(1): >>41868465 #
8. gambiting ◴[] No.41868465{5}[source]
No one put a gun to his head though. Discomfort of English speakers isn't enough reason to not use your real name if that's your preference. Again, speaking from experience.
replies(2): >>41868607 #>>41868639 #
9. PaulHoule ◴[] No.41868607{6}[source]
Many Chinese (speaking) students in the US pick an English language name like “William” or “Wendy” because they know people they meet will struggle with a name which could be several short words with unfamiliar vowels and consonants and tone that matters.
replies(3): >>41868885 #>>41869827 #>>41870189 #
10. protomolecule ◴[] No.41868639{6}[source]
People would want to avoid awkward situation and talk to you (or about you) less.
replies(1): >>41868877 #
11. gambiting ◴[] No.41868877{7}[source]
That's not quite the same as having a gun to your head. Again, I have a slavic name that's extremely difficult to English speakers and I live in the UK - no one is forcing me to change it. I understand some people chose to change their name so it's "easier" for English speakers - and I respect that choice. But let's not pretend that Mr Turyshev was "forced" to change his name - he wasn't.
replies(1): >>41879195 #
12. gambiting ◴[] No.41868885{7}[source]
Of course - and I support their choice. People struggle with my name every day and I could change it to make it easier for English speakers - but I don't think that's quite the same as being "forced" to change it.
13. rendall ◴[] No.41869265{3}[source]
I won't bother? But you don't know me?

Did you mean that English speakers don't pronounce Russian names the way Russians do?

Ask your local Russian to pronounce rural Worcestershire the way that English speakers do.

Your typical Russian speaker cannot. Is it that they aren't "bothering"? The idea is absurd. Let people approximate foreign names in their own tongue. Or, if the way that they naturally pronounce something is truly atrocious, give them a name that is easier to pronounce.

Or watch this fellow give foreign pronunciation his best shot: https://youtu.be/fKGoVefhtMQ Absurd, right?

replies(1): >>41870113 #
14. s1artibartfast ◴[] No.41869827{7}[source]
Sure, but do you refuse to use the names those people give? This takes away their agency. It is their call, not yours.
15. protomolecule ◴[] No.41870113{4}[source]
Okay, that was about as rude on my part as ordering me to stop was on yours. My apologies.

But the point is that most people won't bother to google the pronunciation, listen to it and make an effort to repeat close enough. By the way, Dr. Turyshev's name is the easy part, the surname is the real challenge)

replies(1): >>41871719 #
16. pavel_lishin ◴[] No.41870176{4}[source]
My name is "Pavel", and usually ask Americans to put the accent on the second syllable - which is incorrect, but they can't pronounce my name correctly anyway when they put the accent on the first syllable, and it sounds more wrong to me than the way I prefer to have it pronounced.

Apologies to all the other Pavels out there; I've been training everyone I've met to pronounce it wrong. But it's the way I prefer to be addressed.

replies(1): >>41870710 #
17. pavel_lishin ◴[] No.41870189{7}[source]
It can also be annoying to run the 15-minute gauntlet of "but how do you really pronounce it", and you end up having to play dialect coach.

Going by an easy-to-pronounce name is much less aggravating.

18. airstrike ◴[] No.41870710{5}[source]
Now I'm curious what the _right_ pronunciation is!
replies(1): >>41870847 #
19. pavel_lishin ◴[] No.41870847{6}[source]
You can look it up on Youtube.
20. Teever ◴[] No.41871366[source]
I bet you're talking about his name because you have nothing to contribute to the topic at hand which is solar gravitational lens based telescopes.

Which is understandable as it is a very esoteric topic. But if you don't feel comfortable talking about a subject that doesn't mean that you should change the subject to one that you do feel comfortable with.

People come to Hacker News to see experts talk about these esoteric ideas and you ruin that when you derail the conversation into something relatable out of discomfort.

replies(1): >>41879314 #
21. rendall ◴[] No.41871719{5}[source]
Russians when speaking Russian have no obligation to pronounce my name the way that I do, given that it apparently has sounds that are not in Russian.

I don't think people have that obligation when the name has foreign sounds in it whatever language they're speaking.

replies(1): >>41873780 #
22. protomolecule ◴[] No.41873780{6}[source]
Where did the word 'obligation' appear from?
replies(1): >>41879445 #
23. protomolecule ◴[] No.41879195{8}[source]
Nobody said that it's the same, but the logic of the argument is the same.
24. protomolecule ◴[] No.41879314[source]
You lost the bet. I've been following his solar gravitational lens project since the 'Direct Multipixel Imaging and Spectroscopy of an Exoplanet with a Solar Gravity Lens Mission' [0] paper came out.

What you were betting? You farm, hopefully?

[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11871

replies(1): >>41885800 #
25. rendall ◴[] No.41879445{7}[source]
Perhaps you did not realize that asserting "It's Vyacheslav" and complaining that people do not "bother" to google "proper pronunciation" and "practice" until "good enough" strongly implies obligation? If not, it does. Disagree or not, let's agree to let this go. Feel free to have the last word. I will read it carefully.
replies(1): >>41882772 #
26. protomolecule ◴[] No.41882772{8}[source]
Of course it doesn't.
27. Teever ◴[] No.41885800{3}[source]
That's great! So talk about that stuff instead of bikeshedding what people should call him.