←back to thread

Climate Change Tracker

(climatechangetracker.org)
447 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.432s | source
Show context
marcopicentini ◴[] No.37371940[source]
Why not also tracking eco-anxiety?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-anxiety

replies(2): >>37372124 #>>37372395 #
igravious ◴[] No.37372395[source]
“A new study published in the scientific peer-reviewed journal, Climate, by 37 researchers from 18 countries suggests that current estimates of global warming are contaminated by urban warming biases.

The study also suggests that the solar activity estimates considered in the most recent reports by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) likely underestimated the role of the Sun in global warming since the 19th century.”

https://www.ceres-science.com/post/new-study-suggests-global...

replies(1): >>37372494 #
olddustytrail ◴[] No.37372494[source]
Previously from Willie Soon:

"The paper was strongly criticized by numerous scientists for its methodology and for its misuse of data from previously published studies, which prompted concerns about the peer review process of the paper. The controversy resulted in the resignation of half of the editors of the journal and in the admission by its publisher, Otto Kinne, that the paper should not have been published as it was."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soon_and_Baliunas_controversy

Did it not occur to you to check this?

replies(2): >>37374116 #>>37374648 #
lucb1e ◴[] No.37374116[source]
You don't wonder how they even found this? Between the amount of climate change affirming papers, you'd almost have to be looking at the list of recent controversies
replies(1): >>37374656 #
1. igravious ◴[] No.37374656[source]
Found what?