←back to thread

Climate Change Tracker

(climatechangetracker.org)
447 points Brajeshwar | 2 comments | 03 Sep 23 14:53 UTC | HN request time: 0.439s | source
Show context
chris_va ◴[03 Sep 23 17:17 UTC] No.37372113[source]▶
(I work in a climate group)

These graphs really would benefit from error bars, especially the breakdowns into sector. I would not want a policy maker to rely on those numbers.

replies(3): >>37372305 #>>37372681 #>>37372882 #
1. akudha ◴[03 Sep 23 17:37 UTC] No.37372305[source]▶
Could you please give an example graph from the site, and how you’d improve it?
replies(1): >>37372532 #
2. chris_va ◴[03 Sep 23 17:55 UTC] No.37372532[source]▶
Well, the land/ocean flux numbers for the "Yearly Absorption of Human-Induced Gross CO2 Emissions" have quite large error bars in the literature.

CH4 numbers are also questionable.