←back to thread

1061 points danso | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
lykahb ◴[] No.23351178[source]
The neutral companies, such as utilities, online hosting or financial providers serve nearly everyone with little objections - they defer to the law rather than any internal policies. The more selective companies such as newspapers and TV channels are expected to restrict who can get published.

By representing itself both as an open platform and as a company with progressive values, Twitter has put itself into an awkward in-between spot and is bound to create such controversies.

replies(7): >>23351236 #>>23351412 #>>23351773 #>>23351797 #>>23352829 #>>23355936 #>>23358514 #
riffic ◴[] No.23351797[source]
Twitter has never been a "Utility" in the way that you may be imagining it to be.
replies(2): >>23354918 #>>23355804 #
scaredtobeme ◴[] No.23354918[source]
The argument is that it's getting there. It's the leading platform for public debate in the US right now. Journalists spend their days refreshing their Twitter feed, so the effect isn't just in the size of Twitter's platform but its influence.
replies(4): >>23355123 #>>23355198 #>>23355643 #>>23355685 #
eximius ◴[] No.23355643[source]
Twitter is a plague on public discourse. We'd be better off as a society if it were never invented. If I knew how to put the genie back in the bottle, I would advocate for it.
replies(2): >>23356546 #>>23360049 #
sytelus ◴[] No.23360049[source]
It’s absolutely not. I don’t follow anything political, neither Obama nor Trump. Among 1200+ people I follow are all from AI/ML/biotech/space research. Most of them are academics. I throughly enjoy my feed and it’s my go to place to stay up to date as well as some fun nerdy conversations. Tweeter is a hammer, use wisely.
replies(1): >>23366053 #
1. eximius ◴[] No.23366053[source]
I didn't say it ruined your discourse in your niche. I'm not saying Twitter can't be good to any people.

I'm saying that as a tool for public discussion, it is vile.