←back to thread

1061 points danso | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
darkerside ◴[] No.23349412[source]
As President, or any public figure, you are responsible not only for the intention of your words, but also every feasible interpretation of your words, as well as the impacts of your words, regardless of intention.

I say this not to imply that Trump didn't know that this statement could be taken in multiple ways, but to remind people that even if it can it doesn't matter. It's tragic this has happened, and also tragic to have a leader who reacts to the situation in this way, and that a large swath of the country applauds him for it.

Vague and menacing threats are much more thuggish behavior than emotional reaction to the killing of an unarmed civilian.

As for what Twitter is doing, I'm curious whether they follow this path to it's logical conclusion, which is, eventually Trump being banned from Twitter. He's a huge driver of traffic for them, but perhaps they're thinking about life after Trump at this point, months away from the election.

replies(3): >>23349430 #>>23349449 #>>23349483 #
SpicyLemonZest ◴[] No.23349430[source]
Vague and menacing threats are admittedly thuggish behavior, but I think it's hard to argue that it's more thuggish than burning down a police station.
replies(4): >>23349512 #>>23349652 #>>23352992 #>>23359819 #
1. darkerside ◴[] No.23359819[source]
When I think of thugs, I think of premeditated stick ups, protection money rackets, and intimidation.

A riot is dangerous, unpredictable, and unwise (imo), but I wouldn't characterize it as thuggish. It's clear to me the reason that word was used was to appeal to his base, who are eager to put a label on these protestors as a way of dehumanizing them.

https://theconversation.com/thugs-is-a-race-code-word-that-f...