←back to thread

1061 points danso | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.234s | source
Show context
creaghpatr ◴[] No.23350555[source]
The White House twitter account has issued a response: https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1266367168603721728?s=...

This* Tweet violated the Twitter Rules about glorifying violence. However, @Twitter has determined that it will allow terrorists, dictators, and foreign propagandists to abuse its platform.

*Referring to an attached picture of a Khamenei tweet about Palestine

replies(4): >>23350730 #>>23350743 #>>23351641 #>>23353266 #
jameslk ◴[] No.23353266[source]
Where's the violence though? Or are they applying the stereotypical western misunderstanding of jihad = violence/terrorism?

https://news.gallup.com/poll/7333/jihad-holy-war-internal-sp...

replies(2): >>23354302 #>>23355536 #
Andrew_nenakhov ◴[] No.23354302[source]
When people risk being killed during a jihad, it kinda implies that a text does not refer to a greater jihad aimed at improving one's soul.
replies(1): >>23355412 #
1. jameslk ◴[] No.23355412[source]
Right, which is why "improving one's soul" isn't the only meaning of jihad. This is pointed out in the article I linked.

> The word jihad comes from the Arabic jahada, which is perhaps best translated as "struggle," "effort," or "striving."

This can also be verified with a dictionary or encyclopedia.

> Jihad is an Arabic word which literally means striving or struggling, especially with a praiseworthy aim.

> Jihad, also spelled jehad, in Islam, a meritorious struggle or effort. The exact meaning of the term jihād depends on context; it has often been erroneously translated in the West as “holy war.” Jihad, particularly in the religious and ethical realm, primarily refers to the human struggle to promote what is right and to prevent what is wrong

We can twist the word to focus on violence to accommodate some political objective, but that wouldn't be accurate.