←back to thread

1061 points danso | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
ikeyany ◴[] No.23349451[source]
People are wondering "How far does this go? How can Twitter say this is not cool, but allow something like violent movies or games? Where's the line?"

The leader of the United States encouraging law enforcement and the military to shoot American citizens for looting, that's the line.

replies(11): >>23349490 #>>23349574 #>>23349607 #>>23349609 #>>23349633 #>>23349657 #>>23349681 #>>23350059 #>>23353733 #>>23353915 #>>23354818 #
jtbayly ◴[] No.23350059[source]
It is literally the president’s job to command the military. If he gives a warning that looting will lead to shooting, it is not glorifying violence. It is a statement of fact.

And looting always leads to shooting, regardless of who is saying it.

replies(3): >>23350194 #>>23353759 #>>23354130 #
philjohn ◴[] No.23353759[source]
First of all, look up the Posse Comitatus Act.

Next, the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments to the United States constitution. Telling armed forces to shoot unarmed people because they happen to be looting (e.g. when there is no imminent threat to life) is summary execution and unconstitutional.

replies(2): >>23354088 #>>23354114 #
1. zo1 ◴[] No.23354088[source]
Sure and let's ignore the fact that if anyone stayed in those shops and tried to prevent protestors from "protesting", they'd just be peacefully left alone by those violent criminals because... Some random X-th amendment?

How about martial law, seeing as we're throwing around unrelated legal laws and concepts?

Either way, these ridiculous "protests" indicate a complete break down of society and the government should be sending in the military to arrest people.

replies(1): >>23356063 #
2. philjohn ◴[] No.23356063[source]
Martial law doesn't allow summary execution either.