←back to thread

1061 points danso | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bilbo0s ◴[] No.23347697[source]
In fairness, Trump's tweets are not about actually doing anything, they are more about getting votes. So arguing the feasibility of suggestions outlined in a Trump tweet kind of misses the point.
replies(6): >>23348193 #>>23348240 #>>23348254 #>>23349351 #>>23350212 #>>23351598 #
tehwebguy ◴[] No.23349351[source]
It was a message, directly to law enforcement, that he thinks it’s okay for them to shoot protestors so long as there is looting. I can’t see how anyone would see that as anything other than a crime against humanity
replies(3): >>23350240 #>>23352408 #>>23352446 #
chooseaname ◴[] No.23350240[source]
I don't know why you're getting down voted. Trump's words are a quote of someone who believed that "... it’s okay for them to shoot protestors so long as there is looting."

Trump is very much saying he believes looter should be shot.

replies(2): >>23350560 #>>23352422 #
Balgair ◴[] No.23350560[source]
To be clear here: Looting is not a capital offense. It's stuff. No TV/car/stereo is worth killing a person over. You have insurance for these things (hopefully).

Though laws vary widely in the US, in CA the punishment is about a year in county jail, give or take:

https://www.shouselaw.com/california-looting-laws.html

replies(3): >>23350600 #>>23351057 #>>23352050 #
1. user5994461 ◴[] No.23352050{3}[source]
One's opinion may vary after the third time their home is broken into to steal the TV/stereo/laptops.
replies(2): >>23352183 #>>23352493 #
2. ◴[] No.23352183[source]
3. Consultant32452 ◴[] No.23352493[source]
I'm going to give Trump a C grade on communication on this one. A better Tweet would have been something like, "Minneapolis is why we need the second amendment and stand your ground laws." Followed by calls to Congress on nationwide concealed carry reciprocity, stand your ground, etc.