←back to thread

1061 points danso | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
danso ◴[] No.23347200[source]
Link to @realDonaldTrump tweet: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/12662311007807447...

tweet text:

> ....These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!

Disclaimer text:

> This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules about glorifying violence. However, Twitter has determined that it may be in the public’s interest for the Tweet to remain accessible. Learn more

"Learn more" links to this page about "public-interest exceptions"

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/public-intere...

edit: here's the official thread from @TwitterComms about it: https://twitter.com/TwitterComms/status/1266267446979129345

replies(3): >>23347313 #>>23348215 #>>23352916 #
noobermin ◴[] No.23347313[source]
Why is this reply being downvoted? It is merely informative.
replies(5): >>23347353 #>>23347364 #>>23347463 #>>23347669 #>>23351311 #
bilbo0s ◴[] No.23347669[source]
I think because it just restates what's in the link being discussed, when the link is not inaccessible nor behind a paywall. There are a lot of people who think that's bad form on HN. That's my guess. People trying to force everyone to "read the articles" on HN.
replies(1): >>23347951 #
ttonkytonk ◴[] No.23347951[source]
I appreciate someone posting what was actually said because I have limited data.
replies(1): >>23347991 #
doublesCs ◴[] No.23347991[source]
I appreciate it because I don't want to open the sluggish website that is twitter.
replies(1): >>23350849 #
1. Dayshine ◴[] No.23350849[source]
I appreciate it because when I follow twitter links in my hacker news app I get rate limit blocked...