←back to thread

1061 points danso | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
ikeyany ◴[] No.23349451[source]
People are wondering "How far does this go? How can Twitter say this is not cool, but allow something like violent movies or games? Where's the line?"

The leader of the United States encouraging law enforcement and the military to shoot American citizens for looting, that's the line.

replies(11): >>23349490 #>>23349574 #>>23349607 #>>23349609 #>>23349633 #>>23349657 #>>23349681 #>>23350059 #>>23353733 #>>23353915 #>>23354818 #
mc32 ◴[] No.23349681[source]
Well, so do you censor things like Dr Dre’s 187 because it might be interpreted as inciting violence against (corrupt) police? A public figure of renown among fans.
replies(3): >>23349743 #>>23349779 #>>23349867 #
1. giarc ◴[] No.23349779[source]
I think you could argue the authority level difference between the president and Dr. Dre means something.
replies(1): >>23349840 #
2. mc32 ◴[] No.23349840[source]
You know, the answer is yes and no. Yes the president has more legal authority and perhaps moral authority, and greater reach, but don’t underestimate the authority of people within their circles. Be it a J Gotti ot Suge Knight.