←back to thread

1061 points danso | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.232s | source
Show context
paganel ◴[] No.23347256[source]
I said it yesterday and got downvotes, Twitter’s CEO decided to pick sides in the political battle so they should expect what’s coming to them.
replies(9): >>23347277 #>>23347279 #>>23347281 #>>23347304 #>>23347315 #>>23347316 #>>23348081 #>>23348151 #>>23350496 #
rootlocus ◴[] No.23347279[source]
Fact checking doesn't imply picking sides. Not fact checking does.
replies(5): >>23347290 #>>23347321 #>>23347495 #>>23347560 #>>23348045 #
senectus1 ◴[] No.23347560[source]
it sort of does, WHO they use to check the facts can very def define what side they're on.
replies(1): >>23347583 #
1. celticninja ◴[] No.23347583[source]
or perhaps you use it against the most egregious offences by users with a high number of followers. not much point fact checking my tweets because at worst I could misinform 6 people, perhaps if it was retweeted a lot it would then be fact checked. Trump's verbal/typed diarrhea gets everywhere.