←back to thread

1061 points danso | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
adrianN ◴[] No.23347217[source]
I'm a bit surprised that this fight with the POTUS doesn't have a stronger influence on Twitter's stock value.
replies(2): >>23347242 #>>23347637 #
viraptor ◴[] No.23347242[source]
He's not moving anywhere and any Twitter controversy gets more people to tweet about that controversy... Until he forces a significant part of his followers to leave, it's not a bad situation for Twitter to be in.
replies(5): >>23347267 #>>23347297 #>>23347319 #>>23347327 #>>23347623 #
jacquesm ◴[] No.23347267[source]
> Until he forces a significant part of his followers to leave, it's not a bad situation for Twitter to be in.

That would be even better for Twitter.

replies(1): >>23347338 #
all2 ◴[] No.23347338[source]
Or worse, in terms of discourse. I suppose twitter is awful for something as complex as political debate, but removing an entire half of a political spectrum would only serve to further divide our country, something which the real demagogues of the world would love to capitalize on.
replies(3): >>23347359 #>>23347720 #>>23347798 #
1. jacquesm ◴[] No.23347359{3}[source]
Trump is not half of the political spectrum, he's organized a hostile take-over of a political party that was vulnerable to such take-overs.
replies(1): >>23347429 #
2. all2 ◴[] No.23347429[source]
There's a reason he got elected, and it isn't because of some minority group in the US.
replies(2): >>23347675 #>>23347688 #
3. totalZero ◴[] No.23347688[source]
I would suggest that maybe Hillary Clinton's campaign and candidacy alienated many people in the center. In my mind, that seems to be the simplest explanation for the existence of Obama-Trump voters.
replies(1): >>23350773 #
4. jacobush ◴[] No.23350773{3}[source]
I think the Obama-Trump voters were a result of 8 years of partly empty promises. (He did a lot, but people hoped for much more. Yes we can / yes we scan.)