←back to thread

707 points patd | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.631s | source
Show context
VBprogrammer ◴[] No.23322903[source]
Can this even be considered a free speech issue? They aren't deleting his tweet, only displaying it alongside a fact check. Of course you can try to call into question the impartiality of the fact check but that is a long way from not deciding not to show the content.
replies(6): >>23323205 #>>23327484 #>>23327571 #>>23328045 #>>23329677 #>>23329719 #
mathdev ◴[] No.23327571[source]
A fact check would be fine if it led to objective analyses of some sort, or even Wikipedia. But when I clicked it, it displayed some highly partisan sources, including a CNN article with its usual "Trump bad" vitriol. Maybe it was an algorithm's fault, but it didn't work at all.
replies(3): >>23328047 #>>23328067 #>>23328434 #
1. FillardMillmore ◴[] No.23328783[source]
I thought Wikipedia was built on user contributions and user provided citations? Do you have any sources that would indicate that the Wikimedia Foundation is far left?

If it truly was far left, why doesn't Wikipedia host pages of Pol Pot and Stalin filled with praise? Or, in lieu of praise, at least apologism?

2. ◴[] No.23329048[source]
3. _jal ◴[] No.23329130[source]
It must be utterly exhausting to believe the vast majority of other humans are conspiring against you.
4. oliveshell ◴[] No.23329354[source]
“Reality has a well-known liberal bias.”

–Stephen Colbert, at the 2006 White House Correspondents’ Dinner