←back to thread

350 points tepidandroid | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
gcatalfamo ◴[] No.21023650[source]
This is how you create terrorists. What do you think the children and friends feelings towards the US will be from now on? People get radicalized for much less than that.
replies(12): >>21023867 #>>21023882 #>>21024090 #>>21024098 #>>21024108 #>>21024127 #>>21024148 #>>21024258 #>>21024722 #>>21025214 #>>21025358 #>>21025914 #
alpb ◴[] No.21024258[source]
> This is how you create terrorists.

Um no, you are wrong.

_What USA does_ is terrorism. When you drop bombs on people out of nowhere, that's called terrorism. Sorry if you're an American but you've got some learning to do about the biggest terrorist organization in the world before calling others a terrorist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRbnPA3fd5U

replies(8): >>21024327 #>>21024343 #>>21024354 #>>21024521 #>>21024526 #>>21024607 #>>21024691 #>>21024948 #
yakshaving_jgt ◴[] No.21024521[source]
> When you drop bombs on people out of nowhere, that's called terrorism

Only if the motive for dropping those bombs is to advance a political/ideological agenda.

We need to be very clear that "terrorism" has a very specific meaning. It's not just a group or individual who terrorises.

replies(2): >>21024585 #>>21024699 #
TeMPOraL ◴[] No.21024585[source]
This definition only reinforces the parent's point. What it rules out as "not terrorism" is regular organized crime, which isn't too much into bombings anyway. Bombs are almost never used without a political/ideological agenda, because they're too expensive and require too much coordination to make, maintain and deploy.
replies(1): >>21024628 #
yakshaving_jgt ◴[] No.21024628[source]
By that logic, you could describe WWII as just a bunch of terrorists who disagreed.

Which of course, nobody does.

replies(2): >>21024675 #>>21025906 #
1. saiya-jin ◴[] No.21025906[source]
You're wrong, all those WWII resistance fighters were by definition terrorists to germans/japanese. Its just that US marketing over-used the term in past decade and a half to label anybody inconvenient as a justified target for extermination because 'national security'